• Home
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Blockchain
  • Analysis
  • News
    • Regulations Security
    • Getting Started
  • Insights
    • Opinion
    • Expert Interview
  • All Posts
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • KiloEx Exchange Exploiter Restores All Stolen Funds Following $7.5 Million Hack
  • Hashkey Targets XRP ETF in Asia with New Fund Supported by Ripple
  • Sygnum Predicts Potential Altcoin Rally in Q2 2025 Due to Enhanced Regulations
  • Media Tycoon Files Counterclaim Against Justin Sun in $78 Million Sculpture Dispute
  • Yemenis are embracing DeFi in response to US sanctions on the Houthi group
  • Saylor and ETF Investors’ ‘Stronger Hands’ Contribute to Bitcoin Stabilization — Analyst
  • Bitcoin Dip Buyers Show Interest at BTC Range Lows, Yet Remain Risk-Averse Until $90K Establishes Support
  • Kyrgyzstan’s President Enacts CBDC Legislation Granting Legal Status to ‘Digital Som’
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
CoinovelCoinovel
  • Home
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Blockchain
  • Analysis
  • News
    • Regulations Security
    • Getting Started
  • Insights
    • Opinion
    • Expert Interview
  • All Posts
CoinovelCoinovel
Home » Certain accounts may still be impacted by a historical vulnerability in Trust Wallet iOS discovered in 2018.
Certain accounts may still be impacted by a historical vulnerability in Trust Wallet iOS discovered in 2018.
Certain accounts may still be impacted by a historical vulnerability in Trust Wallet iOS discovered in 2018.

Certain accounts may still be impacted by a historical vulnerability in Trust Wallet iOS discovered in 2018.

0
By admin on 2024-03-12 Blockchain

A recent report from SECBIT Labs, a team of security researchers, suggests that an old vulnerability in the Trust Wallet iOS app may still pose a risk to users who created accounts with it, even if they no longer use the app. The vulnerability was present in the app from February 5 to August 21, 2018, and does not affect accounts created after that time. However, some users may still be unaware of the vulnerability and may be planning to use their exposed wallets.

According to SECBIT, the vulnerability was caused by two functions in the Trust Wallet app that were supposed to be used for testing purposes only. Despite warnings from developers against their use, Trust Wallet accidentally included these functions in the app, making it possible for attackers to guess users’ private keys and steal their funds. SECBIT claims that these accounts are still vulnerable.

It is important to note that this vulnerability is different from a previously acknowledged flaw in Trust Wallet’s browser extension. In response to SECBIT’s claims, Trust Wallet stated in a blog post that the vulnerability only affected a small number of users, who were all notified and migrated to new wallets. Trust Wallet asserts that the vulnerability was patched in July 2018 and that the app is currently safe to use.

SECBIT discovered this flaw while investigating a widespread attack on crypto wallets that occurred in July 2023. Many of the affected accounts had not been used for months or were stored on devices without internet access, making them difficult to hack. Trust Wallet and Klever Wallet were among the most commonly used wallet apps by the victims of the attack, making it challenging to determine the cause of the hack.

Upon further investigation, the researchers found that most of the victims’ addresses had received funds between July and August 2018. The researchers suspected that a similar flaw to the one found in the Libbitcoin Explorer Bitcoin app, which allowed attackers to guess users’ private keys, may have caused the attack.

The researchers analyzed Trust Wallet’s code from July to August 2018 and discovered that the iOS versions of the app used functions from Trezor’s crypto iOS library to generate mnemonic phrases. These functions were not intended for use in production apps, as stated in the developer notes. The researchers found that the generated seed words were not random enough, making Trust Wallet accounts generated during this time vulnerable to being drained.

SECBIT claimed to have generated a database of compromised addresses and forwarded it to the Trust Wallet team. They compared these addresses with the victims of the July 12 hack and found that 83% of the victims had wallets generated using the flawed functions. Trust Wallet allegedly told SECBIT that it had already notified users privately in 2018 and emphasized that the compromised addresses had zero balances. SECBIT urged Trust Wallet to publicly disclose the vulnerability but claims that Trust Wallet did not comply, leading to the publication of their findings.

SECBIT pointed out that Trust Wallet is open-source, meaning that another wallet developer could have used the code and caused their users to generate vulnerable addresses. It is also possible that another wallet developer independently made the same mistake as Trust Wallet by using the affected library.

In response to the report, Trust Wallet emphasized that the current version of the app is not vulnerable and assured users that their funds are safe. Trust Wallet claims to have promptly patched the vulnerability with the support of the security community in 2018 and notified affected users. The team denied claims that they did not adequately inform users and stated that Trust Wallet’s founder took swift action to ensure user security.

Trust Wallet clarified that only a small number of the hacked addresses were associated with its app, and some users may have imported their addresses from other apps. In contrast to SECBIT’s statement, Trust Wallet claims that only one-third of the addresses have the historical vulnerability. They encourage security researchers to participate in their bug bounty program and reiterate their commitment to keeping the wallet secure.

In a separate report, Klever wallet confirmed that some of the victims of the attack had used its app. However, Klever stated that all the addresses had been imported and were not originally created by their app.

Trezor, the provider of the crypto iOS library, emphasized that the function at the center of the controversy was meant for testing purposes only and not for official project development use.

SECBIT’s researchers advised users with Trust Wallet accounts created during the vulnerable period to migrate to new wallets and cease using the old ones. They expressed concern that users who are unaware of the vulnerability may face further loss of funds.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Yemenis are embracing DeFi in response to US sanctions on the Houthi group

Polygon’s Nailwal: The Jio Partnership Will Propel Real-World Web3 Adoption for 450 Million Users

Babylon’s Total Value Locked Decreases by 32% as Wallets Unstake $1.2B in Bitcoin

  • Popular
  • Latest
  • Hot comments
2022-02-23 Getting Started

Cryptopedia: Unveiling the Metaverse’s Potential to Revolutionize the Internet

2022-03-07 Getting Started

Unveiling Cryptopedia: Grasp the fundamentals of DAOs and their operational mechanisms

2022-03-25 Getting Started

Cryptopedia: Explore Web3 and its goal to revolutionize internet services

2025-04-18 Regulations Security

KiloEx Exchange Exploiter Restores All Stolen Funds Following $7.5 Million Hack

2025-04-18 Cryptocurrency

Hashkey Targets XRP ETF in Asia with New Fund Supported by Ripple

2025-04-18 Cryptocurrency

Sygnum Predicts Potential Altcoin Rally in Q2 2025 Due to Enhanced Regulations

Latest Gallery

Latest Recommendations
2025-04-18 Regulations Security

KiloEx Exchange Exploiter Restores All Stolen Funds Following $7.5 Million Hack

2025-04-18 Cryptocurrency

Hashkey Targets XRP ETF in Asia with New Fund Supported by Ripple

2025-04-18 Cryptocurrency

Sygnum Predicts Potential Altcoin Rally in Q2 2025 Due to Enhanced Regulations

2025-04-18 Regulations Security

Media Tycoon Files Counterclaim Against Justin Sun in $78 Million Sculpture Dispute

2025-04-18 Blockchain

Yemenis are embracing DeFi in response to US sanctions on the Houthi group

2025-04-18 Regulations Security

Saylor and ETF Investors’ ‘Stronger Hands’ Contribute to Bitcoin Stabilization — Analyst

2025-04-18 Cryptocurrency

Bitcoin Dip Buyers Show Interest at BTC Range Lows, Yet Remain Risk-Averse Until $90K Establishes Support

2025-04-18 News

Kyrgyzstan’s President Enacts CBDC Legislation Granting Legal Status to ‘Digital Som’

2025-04-17 Blockchain

Polygon’s Nailwal: The Jio Partnership Will Propel Real-World Web3 Adoption for 450 Million Users

2025-04-17 Blockchain

Babylon’s Total Value Locked Decreases by 32% as Wallets Unstake $1.2B in Bitcoin

2025-04-17 Regulations Security

OpenAI pursued a deal with Anysphere prior to shifting its focus to WindSurf

2025-04-17 Analysis

Bitcoin Gold’s Imitation Strategy Could Surpass $150K as BTC Remains ‘Remarkable’

2025-04-17 Cryptocurrency

AI Tokens and Memecoins Dominate Cryptocurrency Narratives in Q1 2025: CoinGecko

2025-04-17 Cryptocurrency

Four Reasons Why the Price of Bitcoin Could Surge to $90,000 in April

2025-04-17 News

Trump Criticizes Powell for Delaying Interest Rate Cuts, Calling It ‘Too Late’

2025-04-17 News

Wyoming Commission Considers Whether Stablecoin Falls Under SEC Regulations

About
About

Coinovel is an enthralling novel of cryptocurrencies. Engage with narratives, delve into stories, and journey through the captivating world of digital currencies.

X (Twitter) Telegram
Popular posts
2022-02-23 Getting Started

Cryptopedia: Unveiling the Metaverse’s Potential to Revolutionize the Internet

2022-03-07 Getting Started

Unveiling Cryptopedia: Grasp the fundamentals of DAOs and their operational mechanisms

2022-03-25 Getting Started

Cryptopedia: Explore Web3 and its goal to revolutionize internet services

Copyright © 2025 coinovel. All rights reserved.
  • Home
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Blockchain
  • Regulations Security
  • Analysis
  • Insights
  • News
  • Getting Started

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.